- Location
- Herefordshire, UK
Yes!
I agree, it seems so Victorian. I find myself imagining them doing the thing they were bred for dressed up in bows and with massive lengths of coat - it feels waaaay over the top. I do like seeing wagging tails on the previously docked breeds thoughI just watched the gundog judging and best in show and that flatcoat is absolutely gorgeous.
I find the way some of the toy/smaller dogs are styled for show pretty off-putting because it doesn't really have anything to do with the dogs. I don't know if I'm explaining that very well, but I can't imagine dogs enjoy having hours spent on haircuts and blow-drying. (I'm thinking of that toy poodle here)
Yeah. I guess it's the blow-drying and accessories that put me off.The poodle cut is functional. As a water dog, it is often shaved to help its movement through the water, except for areas that needed to be kept warm.
Yes, it is. But that Poodle would have sunk if put in the water, the cut was greatly exaggerated and I didn't think it was a beauty contest but a contest of whether the dog was fit for purpose.The poodle cut is functional. As a water dog, it is often shaved to help its movement through the water, except for areas that needed to be kept warm.
Why so? I'm afraid that doesn't stand up to scrutiny if you really think about it. There is nothing to suggest that the dog isn't fit for function.But that Poodle would have sunk if put in the water,
I'm not so sure - assumptions all over the shop here, but it looked thoroughly washed and blow-dried which would likely strip it of natural oils to aid buoyancy, so combined with the physical mass of fur it would be like dipping a sheep with a full fleece.Why so? I'm afraid that doesn't stand up to scrutiny if you really think about it. There is nothing to suggest that the dog isn't fit for function.
As delightful he was, I didn't think his movement was correct. I could be wrong. I thought a jolly little chap was spoiled by exaggerated grooming.Why so? I'm afraid that doesn't stand up to scrutiny if you really think about it. There is nothing to suggest that the dog isn't fit for function.
Yes! Also I have to object to 'catty' and 'bitchy'. I have known some lovely cats and all but one of my six dogs have been bitches and had beautiful sweet natures. A different reason for objecting, but still!Right. So. One of the earlier comments (and a frequently seen theme) us about how conformation people are “catty” and “bitchy”. My question is, how is this different? Casting aspersions because you don’t understand and like the accessories or cuts that you see presented? That you say they can’t be fit for function because, on this one day, they’ve been coiffed. Really? Just… really?!?!!
Question: do you ever exercise? Ever take your dogs on a hike? Do you ever go somewhere where you dress differently? I mean, I very very rarely do, but there are times that I go out for dinner or go to a wedding. Or a business meeting. Sometimes, I put on a bit of slap, even. Does getting presentable and in a frock mean that I can’t go for a 30km hike the next day? Of course it bloody doesn’t.
If Poodles have a specific cut to help the swimming, then this coat was not correct. The top was too long! We are both coming from opposite positions!Why would the coat get too wet to swim just because it’s been poofed up with back-combing? And why could it not swim the next day, when it’s not been coiffed the same way?
“Fit for function” is not determined by a hair cut.
If Poodles have a specific cut to help the swimming, then this coat was not correct. The top was too long! We are both coming from opposite positions!