Surprising diagnosis

I’m sorry you’re having such a worrying time. It’s good that you can carry on as normal, though, so Axel can continue to enjoy a happy life.
 

Beanwood

Administrator
What an awful shock! You must have been reeling from it. I guess (small consolation...) having the diagnosis early means you can be looking in the right direction when you notice any symptoms, meaning you then have the option of treating with the best course of early intervention. I am glad that members with a similar diagnosis have been able to share their knowledge as well as positive experiences. :hug:
 
What a shock for you!

For me it is a wake up call for I feed Finn also grain free (Acana). Now I am thinking of going back to Purina pro plan....I am very happy with Acana, but reading this I change my mind and probably will go back to what he was on before! Thank you also @M.F. for providing this article!
 
What a shock for you, it is encouraging though that the vet says Axel will live a long time yet and that you are doing the right things for him.
He will have a wonderful life with you and now you are prepared and know what to look for you can keep an extra close eye on him. Thank goodness your friend led you down this path.

I had not heard of DCM and it would be great if @snowbunny could start a thread.
 
Now I am thinking of going back to Purina pro plan....I am very happy with Acana, but reading this I change my mind and probably will go back to what he was on before!
The number of affected dogs appears to be increasing (although some of this is anecdotal) but is still tiny.
They can't link DCM to grain-free or specific ingredients.
There are multiple apparent causes of DCM, not all linked to diet.
Look into how the people who recommend certain brands have been financed by those brands.

I don't think you should rush to change away from a food you're happy with as a knee-jerk reaction. @Beanwood is going to start the article later and I'll add my 2¢ as well :D
 
Oh Kelsey that must’ve been such a shock! Sending lots of love to you & Axel. He’s in the best possible hands!


Stanley’s on grain free food 😖

I was always under the impression that Purina and royal canin weren’t that great.. but royal canin pay vets to push it.

I’m reluctant to change his food because he loves it and does well on it and it’s a good quality food. But now I’m a bit scared.
 
@Kelsey&Axel I saw the bald spot but obviously didn't know what was going on. What a shock! It sounds so scary but I'm sure you'll be able to make the best of it and the lovely Axel will be none the wiser.

The last I read re grain free and DCM was that the FDA were investigated and conducting studies. To me this means that there is a concern but nothing is known for certain at this stage.
 
Kelsey, how stressful! All the best with everything. I know in humans having a leaky mitral valve is reasonably common and often asymptomatic, so fingers crossed.

Oh Kelsey that must’ve been such a shock! Sending lots of love to you & Axel. He’s in the best possible hands!


Stanley’s on grain free food 😖

I was always under the impression that Purina and royal canin weren’t that great.. but royal canin pay vets to push it.

I’m reluctant to change his food because he loves it and does well on it and it’s a good quality food. But now I’m a bit scared.
We are in the same boat. Chewie is doing well on grain free puppy food, but now I'm not sure what to do when we transition him to adult food.

With the lack of information out there it is so hard to know what"s the right thing.
 
I know in humans having a leaky mitral valve is reasonably common and often asymptomatic
I don’t know whether you listen to RN’s Health Report with Norman Swan? Last week there was a story of over-diagnosis for spongy heart disease, and the devastation such a diagnosis has—all for nought. It should never have been diagnosed in the first place. I wonder if similar is done with mitral heart disease? Just causes so much anguish.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HAH
As for dog food, I really do believe making your own using high-quality animal protein that has not been exposed to excessively high temperature, and ensuring a variety of nutrients, is the best thing to do. Most dog food (especially kibble) is not only highly processed and cooked at excessively high temperatures, the protein used is usually of extremely poor quality (not fit for human consumption), and it lacks variety which is so necessary for ensuring a wide array of nutrients.
 

Joy

Location
East Sussex
the protein used is usually of extremely poor quality (not fit for human consumption),
This isn't the case in the UK. Here 'Material of animal origin comes from animals which are inspected and passed as fit for human consumption prior to slaughter. The material must be free of transmissible disease, which therefore excludes material from dying, diseased or disable animals.' Pet food
Of course other things you say are the case here too, such as kibble being cooked a very high temperature.
 
Material of animal origin comes from animals which are inspected and passed as fit for human consumption prior to slaughter.
The animals are fit for human consumption prior to slaughter, but this doesn't mean that the parts of the animal that end up in the food, nor the quality control that is used during handling, is suitable for humans. It's far better than in many countries - I know in the USA there have been cases where traces of euthanasia drugs have been found in commercial kibble, as euthanised animals were added in to the mix; something that couldn't happen under UK law. But it also doesn't mean that everything that goes into the kibble is fit for human consumption, even though it sounds as if that is the case.

I don't think there is a correct answer; home-made diets have also been linked to the DCM issue. I do believe that whatever you choose to feed your dog, you would do well to have at least yearly comprehensive haematology and biochemistry analysis to see if there is anything out of balance showing up there.
 
“Not fit for human consumption” is an interesting term, one which I’ve learned fairly recently. It’s about the protein not being accessible via digestion. For example, dog food often has an over abundance of all the bits humans can’t eat, like bones and feathers and hair—which are considered “not fit for human consumption”. After cooking at high temps, they get a protein reading. But the reviews (one of which was on Linda Case’s website—Science Dog) I’ve read say it’s not high enough quality for good health. There was also that awful case of adding melamine to dog food to erroneously increase the protein reading.

Of course, feeding home-cooked or raw food is not a silver bullet. People often want to feed as cheap as possible and can therefore prepare inadequate meals, for example, I hear of people feeding just chicken heads and feet and liver cos it’s cheap—where’s the variety, high quality muscle meat (necessary for taurine), and balanced nutrition? Or, they just get it wrong and feed unbalanced meals regardless of price.
 
Apologies, I’ve written incorrectly that fit for human consumption = human grade. I meant human grade. The term human grade in pet food means the finished product is legally suitable and approved as nourishment for humans. It is "edible."
 

Jacqui-S

Moderator
Location
Fife, Scotland
I don’t know whether you listen to RN’s Health Report with Norman Swan? Last week there was a story of over-diagnosis for spongy heart disease, and the devastation such a diagnosis has—all for nought. It should never have been diagnosed in the first place. I wonder if similar is done with mitral heart disease? Just causes so much anguish.
Actually this is interesting to contemplate.
I don't know how many of you are aware about the controversy over breast screening? About overdiagnosis causing treatment for something which would not have been life changing in any way if not diagnosed at all. Non harmful lesions which cause significant morbidity through worry and "unnecessary" operations.
Food for thought too.
 
Top